Saturday, January 26, 2019

Native American Essay

During the second half(prenominal) of the 19th century, the United States Government took all appropriate actions to support pacification with native Australian American tribes. Furthermore the United States was justified in its scrappy measures used to seize world from unruly autochthonous American tribes during the era. in that respect little validity in this statement. During this while period American multitude were interloping on innate American territory, starting violence, and forcing them out of their homes.The hostility of American Soldiers toward these mess led to several tragedies, such as the Sand creek notwithstandingchering, The Battle of Little Bighorn, and The Battle at Wounded Knee. It can be observed that the United States was clearly not, in any way, shape, or form, attempting to maintain peace. Insensitivities on behalf of the United States led to several tragedies, the Sand Creek execute being a major event. On November 29, 1864, General John Chi vington ordered troops to attack Chief Black Kettle and his people, after the headway and his people did everything in their power to keep peace between the contend sides.To top it all off, most of the warriors in this tribe were off run buffalo, and the tribe was left undefended. Between seventy and eighty Natives were killed. The fighting didnt end there. Several years later, on December 29, 1890, a immense disaster occurred at nearby Wounded Knee Creek, South Dakota. pile W. Forsyth and his men massacred the people of Chief Spotted Elk. Around 300 casualties were suffered. The Natives, however, hadnt perpetually suffered such devastating losses.Between the Sand Creek Massacre and Wounded Knee, at the Battle of Little Bighorn, Colonel George Custer was one of the leaders of the American soldiers who attacked Crazy Horse, Sitting Bull, and their people. On June 25-26, 1876, American Soldiers fought the Lakota, Cheyenne, and Arapaho tribes, suffering a repellent loss. Althou gh it may seem as though the Native Americans were ruthless savages, this proves how stubborn they were and their ability to overcome. The persistence of these people was also proven by a single man.In 1876, the United States Government was beginning to force Chiricahua from their military reserve in New Mexico. A man named Geronimo fueled the fire of the Native Americans against the American forces. Over a period of ten years, Geronimo aided his people in many raids on egg white settlements, to prove their unwillingness to break their home. Geronimo may have surrendered, but his bravery Although many may check these as acts of violence, in reality, US Soldiers were no better. The slaughter and removal of hundreds of Native Americans caused them to react in such a violent way.In other words, America brought this upon itself. The Dawes Act was a set of laws enacted to assist Native Americans in their get down disputes with American settlers. These laws gave the president the make up to survey Indian land and distribute it to individual Natives. The Dawes Act was detrimental to Native Americans because those who werent awarded land became homeless, unlike the previous tribal community they had lived in, where every person had shelter, but no single person owned the land.The president also had the right to purchase land he had allotted to be used for white settlers. Assimilation also played a large role in whether Natives would be forced out of their homes. If the Natives would Americanize (so to speak) everything about their lifestyle, they would be permitted to plosive on US soil. In conclusion, it can be observed that Native Americans were truly the victim in this situation. They were slaughtered mercilessly, forced out of their homes, made to agitate their lifestyles, and even considered to be the cause of the violence.Any person who claims Native Americans during this time period as savage murderers would be completely incorrect. These people were alone reacting out of defense and retaliation for what Americans had done to them. Americans frequently like to weigh that the US is always justified in what they are doing they are always the good guy. In this case Americans stooped to a low aim to suggest that Indians were to blame for the violence.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.