Economy and Pleasure Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

parsimoniousness and Pleasure - Essay ExampleThis new social division - between a class of winners and a class of losers - is very different from other social divisions that have separated i class of citizens from another. For example, other social divisions are weakened - at least to an extent - by religious and social doctrines requiring that the strong help the weak. Unlike these social divisions, competitive economy does not offer all such instruction. Losers, as defined by the author, are those people with which no one knows what to do.The author views these as cornerstone ideals within frugal competition, and as such describes them as destructive, unnatural, and limitless. Additionally, another danger exists in the anarchical free-for-all economy such as competition unlimited economic competitiveness proposes an unlimited ingress of economic power. Essentially, by allowing competition to continue without limits, the social group of winners will eventually shrink temporar y hookup the class of losers continually grows. This growth will eventually place too much power and economic strength into the hands of too few. The author lists several examples of this already happening as land is creation taken away from families, universities, and other homesteads in the interest of growing new industries and technology.Finally, the author moves on to the differences in pleasures when compared to their economic cost or benefit. Essentially, the nation works similarly to its citizens there are different levels of wants and desires - or pleasures - that the nation considers acquiring. Just as a person would carefully weigh the cost against the benefit when considering a new pleasure the nation often considers the same cost vs. benefit ration.Two EconomiesTo begin, an anecdote explains the background and large scale involvement that the economy mustiness entail although the author distressingly chose the term The domain of God to exemplify this scale, the aut hor successfully explained his position. The scope of the economy must be comprehensive affluent to include everything, both believers and non-believers, regardless of their level of understanding or acknowledgement, and with the acceptance that trying to violate the enounce of such an institution will result in absolute and severe penalties. The term keen Economy was finally settled on with the same purpose to try and exemplify the scope with which the reader must recognize as being encompassed by the economy. In contrast, Human Economy is not as large-scale. Rather, humankind economy is smaller and more focused on the definitions and values of human goods. The largest difference between the Great Economy and the Human Economy is that the Great Economy can earn and supply value, but cannot constitute or appraise such value. Human Economy can identify and appraise value, but cannot create value. Value originates within the Great Economy, and is then added to, evaluated, identif ied, and measured within the Human Economy. The onset of inflation and poor economy is a direct result of Humans claiming the ability to create value.According to the author, a popular word of the industrial